November 24, 2008 at 9:10 pm | In Uncategorized | 6 Comments
When I left Vault 101, and saw this tower rising from the horizon:
I thought to myself, “Really? Another deconstructed tower in the distance?”
Instead of immediately identifying it as the Washington Monument, which I’ve seen countless times in films, and on TV, I thought of this:
So, when I was heading into DC to find the Vault-Tec offices, this is what I thought I was heading towards, Vault-Tec sounding suitably like the sci-fi occupants for a sci-fi building. And when I finally came out of a side-street, and onto the Mall, and saw the Capitol at one end, and the charred and decrepit corpse of the Monument at the other, my jaw fell to the floor, even more heavily than it would have done if I’d realised what it was when I first saw it at a distance.
Is my imagination and memory tainted by the created worlds I’ve played in all these years?
It would seem so…
I know Geoff & I have talked about how Prince of Persia & GTA impinged upon our view of the world – play PoP too much, and you suddenly see the town around you as an obstacle course. Play GTA too much, and everything takes on a hyper-real quality, with violence always seemingly moments away.
But this is the first time I think I’ve mistaken a real-world artifact for one from a virtual world.
Scenius vs Sabotage
June 17, 2008 at 2:00 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentA couple of recent & highly-linked posts dovetail rather well. One is about Brian Eno’s conception of scenius; “Scenius stands for the intelligence and the intuition of a whole cultural scene. It is the communal form of the concept of the genius.” The other is a 1944 US Strategic Services manual detailing how to sabotage a workplace. The two read like mirror-images:
The geography of scenius is nurtured by several factors:
• Mutual appreciation — Risky moves are applauded by the group, subtlety is appreciated, and friendly competition goads the shy. Scenius can be thought of as the best of peer pressure.
• Rapid exchange of tools and techniques — As soon as something is invented, it is flaunted and then shared. Ideas flow quickly because they are flowing inside a common language and sensibility.
• Network effects of success — When a record is broken, a hit happens, or breakthrough erupts, the success is claimed by the entire scene. This empowers the scene to further success.
• Local tolerance for the novelties — The local “outside” does not push back too hard against the transgressions of the scene. The renegades and mavericks are protected by this buffer zone.
(1) Insist on doing everything through “channels.” Never permit short-cuts to be taken in order to expedite decisions.
(2) Make “speeches.” Talk as frequently as possible and at great length. Illustrate your “points” by long anecdotes and accounts of per sonal experiences. Never hesitate to make a few appropriate “patriotic” comments.
(3) When possible, refer all matters to committees, for “further study and consideration.” Attempt to make the committees as large as possible — never less than five.
(4) Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible.
(5) Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions.
(6) Refer back to matters decided upon at the last meeting and attempt to re-open the question of the advisability of that decision.
(7) Advocate “caution.” Be “reasonable” and urge your fellow-conferees to be “reasonable” and avoid haste which might result in embarrassments or difficulties later on.
(8) Be worried about the propriety of any decision — raise the question of whether such action as is contemplated lies within the juris diction of the group or whether it might conflict with the policy of some higher echelon.
Which of these does your workplace resemble?
Rambling thoughts on citizen journalism
April 29, 2008 at 11:41 am | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentC4 news invited its audience to report any factual claims made by politicians during the last general election. These claims were then investigated, and any discrepancies reported. What access does C4 news have that we lack that allows them to do this, but prevents us from doing the same?
Would a CJ hub have the clout to get access? How can privileged access be rested from the hands of the actors when both the source & the journalist have a vested interest in their privileged relationship?
The trend towards transparency should make more info more available – a concerted effort to make difficult to obtain information easily accessible would ease the barriers to entry for Citizen Journalists to do low-level fact-checking & investigation. The bureaucracy of obtaining this information might scale – the frustration/time sink of the red tape could be reduced by an automated/technologically augmented process.
If investigative journalism is the correlation of heretofore hidden data, then by reducing the time/cost/effort of uncovering that data would/could lead to more time/effort being available to spend on identifying correlations.
*The slow death of the small city newspaper.
If sub-1million-inhabitant cities lose their newspapers, can CJ take up the investigative slack in time to prevent increases in corruption/nepotism?
Could there be a Craigslist-type disruptive tool/service for CJ? [Is there already?]
How could the integrity of such a service be maintained… by peer review? Whuffie? Could a mainstream news organisation lend its reputation – The New Orleans Grauniad? Would automated ads reduce/eliminate undue editorial influence?
Individual journalists have funded their reportage via public donations.
Dispersed journalism – 10/100/1000 people can cover more geographical space.
CJ’s can offer their services to someone who has an interest/lead on a story -
Specific skillsets could be listed so that CJ’s can ask for/offer their services more specifically: legal/scientific/cultural expertise could be applied when needed
Ad-hoc groups could form & reform as an investigation continues – facts could be checked by more than one person, to prevent misunderstanding/malpractice.
Could there be Guilds/Clans of similarly skilled/interested CJ’s?
Where is a story published once it reaches critical mass?
- on the lead journo’s blog?
- on the hub site?
- in a newspaper/magazine that has commissioned or been offered the piece?
Will the idea of “the paper of record” disappear, evolve, or be transformed into something else?
*The attention of CJ’s could be focussed on struggling/demanding/underfunded neighborhoods – they have as many stories to be told about them, but are mostly ignored as mainstream journalists don’t live there. Telling these stories could help bring about change.
McSweeney’s revitalised short story publishing in the US – what will do the same for investigative reporting?
[all of this inspired by Clay Shirky's talk on the cognitive surplus]
March 24, 2008 at 6:31 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Our doubts are traitors, and make us lose the good we oft might win, by fearing to attempt.
Think big.
March 24, 2008 at 3:37 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentMake no little plans; they have no magic to stir men’s blood and probably themselves will not be realized. Make big plans; aim high in hope and work, remembering that a noble, logical diagram once recorded will not die, but long after we are gone be a living thing, asserting itself with ever-growing insistence. Remember that our sons and our grandsons are going to do things that would stagger us. Let your watchword be order and your beacon beauty.
* Moore, Charles. Daniel H. Burnham, Architect, Planner of Cities
it’s full of stars
May 21, 2007 at 6:01 pm | In Uncategorized | Leave a CommentThis blog isn’t dead, it’s just in a dotcoma.
Things are swooping merrily along here though.
links for 2007-04-29
April 29, 2007 at 1:27 am | In Uncategorized | Leave a Comment-
Goodbye, Uncle Ken. You mad old coot.
links for 2007-04-22
April 22, 2007 at 1:29 am | In Uncategorized | Leave a Comment-
“…the scale now of residential buildings isn’t so different from the scale of buildings that were once meant to symbolize state power, on an institutional scale. The dictatorial vernacular is not so far off from the American suburban vernacular.”
links for 2007-04-21
April 21, 2007 at 1:31 am | In Uncategorized | Leave a Comment-
How game design is all about stirring ‘play, joy, and freedom’ into the cultural mix before we bake our Great Big Singularity Cake.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.







